Is the CBC paying for porn? | Canada | News | Toronto Sun
Is the CBC paying for porn?
263By Kris Sims ,Parliamentary Bureau
More Coverage
Related Stories
- CBC clears self in shock outcome: Goldstein
- CBC still refusing to release info
- CBC scores big in budget
- CBC salaries disclosed... sort of
- Surprise! CBC report lauds CBC
- CBC French boss: Nothing wrong with 'Hard'
- Time to tune out Minister Moore
- Radio-Canada changes timeslot for racy TV show
- Funding for filth
- CBC doubles down on pornography
- CBC wants censorship
- Reactions to CBC porn
- CBC upset by its own programming
- CBC prez wants another go at the trough
- Vancouver cops in e-mail porn scandal
Related Videos
Topics
Tou.tv is described as "entertainment oriented web TV video on demand offered by Radio-Canada and twenty partners, broadcasters and producers. It is the largest web TV entertainment in French Canada."
The website includes a show entitled Hard that has scenes of soft core pornography.
"If this is the RDI using French actors through our tax system in order to produce this, I would say it is not a good use of taxpayers' dollars. I think most Canadians and Quebecers would say, 'What the heck is going on here?'" said NDP MP Peter Stoffer after viewing a sample of the raunchiest scenes.
"To allocate dollars for things of a sexual nature like this would make most Quebecers and most Canadians uncomfortable."
At least one Liberal MP agreed with him.
"I can understand promoting the French language, but I certainly would not support anything that involves porn, that's for sure," said Liberal MP Lawrence MacAulay, who passed on seeing the clips, but said he wouldn't support it even if they had used actors from Quebec instead of France.
It's not known how much money CBC paid to offer the online programming, as they said it was an acquisition and the amount paid was confidential.
"Hard is not considered a pornographic program. It is rated 16+," wrote Marco Dube, spokesman for Radio Canada. "Radio-Canada does not air pornographic series on any of its platforms."
The video plays after a caution that it's best suited for those 16 years of age or older.
"If that's the case then the CBC could consider other programming for their applications," said Heritage Minister James Moore, who said he would like to see a stronger warning put on the site. "I know you are in the business of going after the CBC, but I can't comment on something that I haven't seen."
Some Conservative MPs disapproved of the content being shown on a site connected to the state broadcaster.
"I don't think my constituents would like paying for any television programming made outside of Canada," said Rob Merrifield, a Tory MP from Alberta. "It doesn't look right to me."
His caucus colleague John Williamson, former head of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, agrees.
"This kind of programming should not be on a broadcaster that is funded by taxpayers, that receives a billion dollars a year, this kind of industry does not need tax dollars to support it," Williamson said.
Reader's comments »
By adding a comment on the site, you accept our terms and conditions and our netiquette rules. Comments for this page are closed.
Showing 1-20 of 262 comments
- AlthePal52
- AlthePal52
- pieceofmymind
- Yellow_Fish
- pieceofmymind
- IanClunas
- answell
- zeeman1
- Gord Downie
- Mike Jones
- robmik1943LK
- IstvanTheHun
- Dennis_Wharton
Sponsored Links
Top stories
Social activity
More from Canada
Inside Toronto sun.com
Is the CBC paying for porn?
263By Kris Sims ,Parliamentary Bureau
More Coverage
Related Stories
- CBC clears self in shock outcome: Goldstein
- CBC still refusing to release info
- CBC scores big in budget
- CBC salaries disclosed... sort of
- Surprise! CBC report lauds CBC
- CBC French boss: Nothing wrong with 'Hard'
- Time to tune out Minister Moore
- Radio-Canada changes timeslot for racy TV show
- Funding for filth
- CBC doubles down on pornography
- CBC wants censorship
- Reactions to CBC porn
- CBC upset by its own programming
- CBC prez wants another go at the trough
- Vancouver cops in e-mail porn scandal
Related Videos
Topics
Tou.tv is described as "entertainment oriented web TV video on demand offered by Radio-Canada and twenty partners, broadcasters and producers. It is the largest web TV entertainment in French Canada."
The website includes a show entitled Hard that has scenes of soft core pornography.
"If this is the RDI using French actors through our tax system in order to produce this, I would say it is not a good use of taxpayers' dollars. I think most Canadians and Quebecers would say, 'What the heck is going on here?'" said NDP MP Peter Stoffer after viewing a sample of the raunchiest scenes.
"To allocate dollars for things of a sexual nature like this would make most Quebecers and most Canadians uncomfortable."
At least one Liberal MP agreed with him.
"I can understand promoting the French language, but I certainly would not support anything that involves porn, that's for sure," said Liberal MP Lawrence MacAulay, who passed on seeing the clips, but said he wouldn't support it even if they had used actors from Quebec instead of France.
It's not known how much money CBC paid to offer the online programming, as they said it was an acquisition and the amount paid was confidential.
"Hard is not considered a pornographic program. It is rated 16+," wrote Marco Dube, spokesman for Radio Canada. "Radio-Canada does not air pornographic series on any of its platforms."
The video plays after a caution that it's best suited for those 16 years of age or older.
"If that's the case then the CBC could consider other programming for their applications," said Heritage Minister James Moore, who said he would like to see a stronger warning put on the site. "I know you are in the business of going after the CBC, but I can't comment on something that I haven't seen."
Some Conservative MPs disapproved of the content being shown on a site connected to the state broadcaster.
"I don't think my constituents would like paying for any television programming made outside of Canada," said Rob Merrifield, a Tory MP from Alberta. "It doesn't look right to me."
His caucus colleague John Williamson, former head of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, agrees.
"This kind of programming should not be on a broadcaster that is funded by taxpayers, that receives a billion dollars a year, this kind of industry does not need tax dollars to support it," Williamson said.
Reader's comments »
By adding a comment on the site, you accept our terms and conditions and our netiquette rules. Comments for this page are closed.
Showing 1-20 of 262 comments
- AlthePal52
- AlthePal52
- pieceofmymind
- Yellow_Fish
- pieceofmymind
- IanClunas
- answell
- zeeman1
- Gord Downie
- Mike Jones
- robmik1943LK
- IstvanTheHun
- Dennis_Wharton
Showing 1-20 of 262 comments